Re: My schedule, 2.4 schedule
- From: Matthias Clasen <maclas gmx de>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: My schedule, 2.4 schedule
- Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:24:45 +0100
Am Do, den 25.12.2003 schrieb Tor Lillqvist um 00:30:
> > - 120299 Win32 iochannel/g_poll/etc code needs rewrite
> > no patch, sounds like a lot of work
>
> The actual rewrite most probably won't happen in time for 2.4.0, but
> could the suggested (minor) API addition (with dummy implementations)
> be included in 2.4?
What would be the point of including the api without a working
implementation ? That would introduce a de facto API change during the
stable series at the point where the api starts working, forcing apps
who need the new api to check for 2.4.x, x > 0.
Matthias
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]