Re: po/Makefile.in.in patch for glib-2-2 branch

[James Henstridge <james daa com au>]

Owen Taylor wrote:

> OK, should be fine to commit.
Done.

> Just a thought ... but maybe there is some way we can make GLib's
> Makefile.in.in ready-for-intltool.
If I was writing intltool today, I would probably try to make the tools 
argument compatible with the GNU gettext tools.  That way the "patching" 
process could be confined to redefining some AC_SUBST's in configure.in. 
I don't know if doing that is feasible now or not though.

> Or alternatively, intltool should install it's own po/Makefile.in.in.
>
> This patching thing is just incredibly non-robust.
>  
Agreed.  At the moment, my main aim has been to make sure it doesn't 
hold up build tool updates for other packages.  It is probably worth 
revisiting this at a later time though.

James.

--
Email: james daa com au
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/