Re: glib 2.2.3 test failures on Solaris
- From: Albert Chin <gtk-devel-list thewrittenword com>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Cc: maclas gmx de
- Subject: Re: glib 2.2.3 test failures on Solaris
- Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:02:07 -0500
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 06:28:10AM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 18:00, Albert Chin wrote:
> > I'm getting a test failure in strtod-test on glib-2.2.3 on Solaris
> > 2.5.1-9/SPARC with Sun's C compiler, HP-UX 11.00 with the HP C
> > compiler, and AIX 5.1 with the IBM C compiler. The problem is:
>
> This is:
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101874
>
> The problem is that the trio implementation of printf() is not accurate
> enough for doubles. In glib-2.4, we are using the gnulib printf
> implementation which uses the system's numeric formatting.
I just pulled down HEAD and get a coredump on HP-UX 11.x and funky
bahaviour on AIX. The following is from HP-UX 11i with the HP C
compiler:
gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/opt/build/glib-2.4.0/gobject'
echo "#ifndef __G_MARSHAL_H__" > xgen-gmh \
&& echo "#define __G_MARSHAL_H__" >> xgen-gmh \
&& ./glib-genmarshal --nostdinc --prefix=g_cclosure_marshal
./gmarshal.list --header >> xgen-gmh \
&& echo "#endif /* __G_MARSHAL_H__ */" >> xgen-gmh \
&& (cmp -s xgen-gmh gmarshal.h 2>/dev/null || cp xgen-gmh gmarshal.h) \
&& rm -f xgen-gmh xgen-gmh~ \
&& echo timestamp > stamp-gmarshal.h
./glib-genmarshal --nostdinc --prefix=g_cclosure_marshal
./gmarshal.list --body >> xgen-gmc \
&& cp xgen-gmc gmarshal.c \
&& rm -f xgen-gmc xgen-gmc~
/bin/sh: 29114 Memory fault(coredump)
$ gdb .libs/glib-genmarshal core
gdb> bt
#0 0xc016eaa4 in memset+0x5c () from /usr/lib/libc.2
#1 0x4224 in indent (n_spaces=4294967295) at glib-genmarshal.c:313
#2 0x45f4 in generate_marshal (signame=0x40008340 "VOID__VOID",
sig=0x7f7f065c) at glib-genmarshal.c:374
#3 0x4f50 in process_signature (sig=0x7f7f065c) at glib-genmarshal.c:507
#4 0x58a4 in main (argc=2, argv=0x7f7f0464) at glib-genmarshal.c:696
Should the above bug report be reopened or should I create a new one?
In gobject/glib-genmarshal.c:
/* cfile marhsal header */
g_fprintf (fout, "void\n");
ind = g_fprintf (fout, "%s_%s (", marshaller_prefix, signame);
g_fprintf is returning -1.
--
albert chin (china thewrittenword com)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]