Re: GType <=> gpointer

On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 03:28, Manish Singh wrote:
> Uhm, those casts aren't really correct on x86_64 either (though it will
> work in most cases). type = (GType) pointer should work just fine. How
> did you come to the conclusion it was required?

compiler warnings on x86_64 were complaining about implicit type casts
and such. and in a few places x86 had and we'd done incorrect casts that
caused a problem or two, if i'm not mistaken. 


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]