On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 18:30 +0100, Sander Vesik wrote: > --- Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 13:21 -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote: > > > Sander Vesik <sander_traveling yahoo co uk> writes: > > > > > > > If it goes in, shouldn't whetever there is a blink feedback or not be themable > > with > > > > the default of no blinking? > > > > > > It will be made a style property. > > > > Style property doesn't make sense to me for a behavior that's more or > > less independent of the theme drawing. > > > > Surely its as much a "look and feel" issue as any other aspect of a theme? Well, themes are really just *look*, not feel. There are some feel things in themes - e.g., arrow position for scrollbars, but they are typically ones that require drawing changes to support. Tying behaviors into the theme that don't relate to theme drawing causes people to create BluecurveMinusMenuBlinking themes or suchlike. Generally GtkSettings work better for behavior. Regards, Owen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part