Re: Updated proposal for making the GtkFileChooser code asynchronous
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Bill Haneman <Bill Haneman Sun COM>
- Cc: Federico Mena Quintero <federico ximian com>, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Updated proposal for making the GtkFileChooser code asynchronous
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:19:36 -0500
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 21:50 +0000, Bill Haneman wrote:
> Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 17:47 +0000, Bill Haneman wrote:
> >
> >
> >>One thing that isn't clear to me, from my admittedly superficial reading
> >>of the proposals, is how the need to notify clients of changes to the
> >>file chooser list will be implemented.
> >>
> >>For accessibility, we will need to fire notifications via ATK of all
> >>changes to the file chooser list. This means we need GtkFileChooser
> >>signals to connect to here in libgail.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Kris's changes don't touch the widgetry at all. They are all in the
> >backend. GAIL will see whatever it is accustomed to see from the file
> >chooser's widgets.
> >
> >
> GAIL is not used to the widgets having stuff added to the list
> asynchronously. Are you saying that this change will not cause the list
> to be incrementally grown?
The gnome-vfs file chooser backend -- the one that is default in a GNOME
desktop -- already incrementally grows the file lists.
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]