Re: Some new GString functions - constructors



On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:19:59AM +0100, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
> At least in my sources, and where they draw inspiration from there is
> a larger precedence for the suffix _dup, rather than _clone.

g_string_dup() also works, yes.. I'm not overly attached to the name. 

Thoughts anyone?

-- 
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans

leonerd leonerd org uk
ICQ# 4135350       |  Registered Linux# 179460
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]