On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 15:24 -0400, Luis Villa wrote: > So, I turned on make check in tinderbox today, and I'm learning all > kinds of 'exciting' things. :) gtk+'s excitement today: > > make[4]: Entering directory `/home/bb/microtinder/cvs/gtk+/gtk' > --- expected-abi 2005-07-14 15:19:22.737194592 -0400 > +++ actual-abi 2005-07-14 15:19:26.800576864 -0400 > @@ -2423,6 +2423,7 @@ > gtk_tree_row_reference_copy > gtk_tree_row_reference_deleted > gtk_tree_row_reference_free > +gtk_tree_row_reference_get_model > gtk_tree_row_reference_get_path > gtk_tree_row_reference_get_type > gtk_tree_row_reference_inserted > @@ -2521,6 +2522,7 @@ > gtk_tree_view_column_new_with_attributes > gtk_tree_view_column_pack_end > gtk_tree_view_column_pack_start > +gtk_tree_view_column_queue_resize > gtk_tree_view_columns_autosize > gtk_tree_view_column_set_alignment > gtk_tree_view_column_set_attributes > @@ -2573,6 +2575,7 @@ > gtk_tree_view_get_selection > gtk_tree_view_get_type > gtk_tree_view_get_vadjustment > +gtk_tree_view_get_visible_range > gtk_tree_view_get_visible_rect > gtk_tree_view_insert_column > gtk_tree_view_insert_column_with_attributes > FAIL: abicheck.sh > ======================================================================= > 1 of 1 tests failed > Please report to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gtk%2B > ======================================================================= > > What does this mean, exactly? Should i|tinderbox be ignoring it? > reporting it religiously as a bug? Should it be expected to happen on > a semi-regular basis? These indicate that someone added public functions and forgot to update gtk.symbols. The effect of the problem being reported here: - GTK+ for windows will be missing these exports - Some internal code generation optimizations are missed But the same error could also reflect more serious (for GNOME) problems where: - We accidentally remove a function - We accidentally leak a static function These failures tend to get caught when we do 'make distcheck', but filing them would still be appreciated ... if we regularly thwap people who don't update gtk.symbols, hopefully we can avoid having problems like this very often. Regards, Owen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part