Re: g_try_new and g_try_new0 + error reporting for g_object_set



Stefan Kost said:
> As the mail remained uncommented, it has now been posted under
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=169611
>
> Stefan Kost wrote:
>> hi hi,
>>
>> is there a reason why we dont have g_try_new and g_try_new0.

why is g_try_malloc() not sufficient?

http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/glib/glib-Memory-Allocation.html#g-try-malloc

or simply using malloc() (or calloc()) directly?

-- 
muppet <scott at asofyet dot org>



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]