Re: introspection and broken API

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 15:30 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
> 
> Is there any reason to hide destroy() though?  If you hide it, you'll 
> need to provide some other way to destroy toplevel windows, among other 
> things.

I'd move it to GtkWidget I think.


> I'd put this one under "provide sane default values for arguments where 
> appropriate", for languages that support default argument values (like 
> C++, Python, Java, etc).
> 
> If language bindings provide default argument values, then it would 
> probably be good if they use the same defaults :)

Sensible.

Havoc