Re: policy for commiting api docs
- From: Unknown <ensonic hora-obscura de>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: policy for commiting api docs
- Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 14:06:03 +0000
first version is availableat
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302556
ciao
Stefan
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 18:36 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 19:42 +0000, Unknown wrote:
> >
>
> Hey Stefan -
>
> > I noticed that the
> > * GtkBinding modules is undocumented
> > * signals for the GtkTreeView are undocumented
> >
> > I volunteer to work on this (grepping though the changelogs of the file
> > and asking here). Docs are important - it's quite unfair of the ones who
> > originally wrote the code to leave out the docs.
>
> We didn't have a API docs system when GtkBinding was created. We didn't
> have a standard way of documenting signals when GtkTreeView was
> created :-)
>
> > Now I'd like to know, if I may commit doc additions right away or if I
> > should better send a patch to bugzilla and/or this list for review.
>
> bugzilla, at least for now.
>
> Owen
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]