Re: Conflicting recommendations about using GTK_BIN(widget)->child in Gtk+ documentation
- From: Jean Bréfort <jean brefort normalesup org>
- To: zuh iki fi
- Cc: "gtk-devel-list gnome org" <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Conflicting recommendations about using GTK_BIN(widget)->child in Gtk+ documentation
- Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2006 11:52:34 +0100
Le mardi 03 janvier 2006 �2:00 +0200, Kalle Vahlman a �it :
> Hi all.
>
> I noticed that there is a conflict in what GtkBin docs say:
>
> http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/GtkBin.html#GtkBin-struct
> "
> The GtkBin-struct struct contains the following fields. (These fields
> should be considered read-only. They should never be set by an
> application.)
>
> GtkWidget *child; the child widget.
> "
>
> and what the GtkComboBoxEntry docs say:
>
> http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/GtkComboBoxEntry.html#gtk-combo-box-entry-new-with-model
> "
> You can get the GtkEntry from a GtkComboBoxEntry using GTK_ENTRY
> (GTK_BIN (combo_box_entry)->child).
> "
>
> So either the GtkBin or GtkComboBoxEntry docs needs to be changed in
> this regard.
Why? You can access it, but it is read-only; you must not set it.
Using:
GTK_BIN (combo_box_entry)->child = my_widget;
is a bug, even if the compiler accepts it.
> Considerations:
>
> 1) GTK_BIN(widget)->child is officially available as
> gtk_bin_get_child(), so it's not like it would be required to retrieve
> the entry from a GtkComboBoxEntry.
>
> 2) GTK_BIN(widget)->child is insanely more pleasant to use in code,
> and a little more object oriented than gtk_bin_get_child() (which is
> in my books always a good thing :)
>
> 3) Use of public widget struct members are used succesfully with
> GtkDialog (->vbox and ->action_area), so it's not like doing something
> new.
>
> 4) Given the GtkComboBoxEntry docs recommendation and personal
> observations, GTK_BIN(widget)->child is a common trait so it can't
> really be considered as a contender for change in any way without
> breaking a multitude of code. No point in trying to hide it instead of
> embracing it, right?-)
>
> So my score is on the side of admitting GtkBin->child as a public
> member in the docs, what's yours?
>
> --
> Kalle Vahlman, zuh iki fi
> Powered by http://movial.fi
> Interesting stuff at http://syslog.movial.fi
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]