Re: GTK+ modularization

["Murray Cumming" <murrayc murrayc com>]

> On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 08:59 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
>> > This has been discussed a bit at Guadec; and I have started looking
>> into
>> > what it would take to allow compiling GTK+ with certain subsets of
>> > widgets.
>> >
>> > My current patch defines a small number of optional subsets:
>> >
>> > * broken: widgets covered by GTK_ENABLE_BROKEN
>> > * deprecated: widgets covered by GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED
>>
>> Does this also remove deprecated functions, signals, properties, etc.
>> That
>> might give an extra few %.
>
> It removes entire source files from the build. Thus no traces of the
> removed types remain, no properties, no signals, no classes. You are
> right that it would be valuable to also compare the runtime effect
> of subsetting.

I meant, for instance, deprecated functions in non-deprecated files.


Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com