Re: FSF address in license comments (Bug 334745)

["Matthias Clasen" <matthias clasen gmail com>]

> now i'm sending this around to:
>
> a) sense what people think about having *just* http://www.gnu.org/. mentioned
>     as FSF "address", and
>
> b) get the FSF side on arranging for something like a PO Box and use that as
>     license header FSF address.

Either of them would be preferable to continued updating of the FSF's address
in bazillion source files. But the FSF may have lawyerly reasons for insisting
on the address in there ?

Matthias