Re: GtkBuilder status
- From: Johan Dahlin <johan gnome org>
- To: Yevgen Muntyan <muntyan tamu edu>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GtkBuilder status
- Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 12:10:58 -0300
>> It'll be fairly easy to add support for this in the signal tag,
>> so you can specify the data argument. It would require two attributes
>> one for the data and one for the type, then you'd do:
>>
>> <signal name="activated" handler="quit_cb" data="window1"
>> data-type="GObject"/>
>>
>> void quit_cb (GtkAction *action, GtkWindow *window);
>>
>>
> No sir, I don't want that action there! I want
> void my_cb (GtkWidget *window). It will be fairly easy
> to use connect_swapped, of source.
That already works:
<signal name="activated" handler="quit_cb" object="window1"/>
>> I never claimed GtkUIManager was perfect. I just said it was the
>> obvious way
>> of creating menus and toolbars. It might be overkill in smaller
>> applications, but if they use gtkbuilder they won't even notice.
>>
>>
> Well, I personally don't care about what's inside as long as I am not
> forced to know that. If everything will work just like as it did before
> (namely the "connect this callback to this menu item"), then it's
> perfectly fine.
Assuming s/menu item/action/, then it will.
Johan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]