Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

[Loïc Minier <lool+gnome via ecp fr>]

On Mon, Sep 25, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> And the DFB backend was indeed found to be broken by the gtk-gnome 
> Debian team when they tried to build a DFB flavour of GTK for use in the 
> debian-installer.

 I just cvs updated the gtk-2-10 branch, and it's still lacking these
 fixes:
 - replace "stuc" with "stub" in gtk/Makefile.am
 - missing gtk/gtkplug-stub.c and gtksocket-stub.c files in the tarball
 - fixes from this commit:
    2006-09-13 Michael Emmel <mike emmel gmail com>
       * gdk/directfb/gdkcolor-directfb.c small clean ups include order
       * gdk/directfb/gdkwindow-directfb.c fixed beep compile error
       * gdk/directfb/Makefile.am removed GDK_PIXBUF_DISABLE_DEPRECATED
           GDK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED to allow compile per Behdad

     (I've backported these files from HEAD:
     gtk+2.0-2.10.4/gdk/directfb/gdkcolor-directfb.c
     gtk+2.0-2.10.4/gdk/directfb/gdkwindow-directfb.c
     gtk+2.0-2.10.4/gdk/directfb/Makefile.am
     )

> Is there a way to check if the DirctFB backend builds correctly before a 
> major GTK relase, like (i guess) is done for X and win32 backends?

 Would be nice.

-- 
Loïc Minier <lool dooz org>