Re: new stock icons

[Jakub Steiner <jimmac gmail com>]

Hi.
Has there been any resolution of the matter? People keep bugging me
about it.

thanks!

On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 21:42 +0200, Michael Natterer wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 10:14 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 16:09 +0200, Kristian Rietveld wrote:
> > 
> > > In summary, I don't see much issues with replacing the icons.  If we want
> > > to make use of some kind of "transition period" as suggested, we should
> > > decide on replacing the icon set ASAP.
> > 
> > I already stated that I am not against the icon update. Formulating
> > conservatively here, since the update will not actually be visible for
> > anybody but embedded and win32, so I'd like to defer the final the
> > decision about this to people who have more ties to these situations. 
> 
> Very well :)
> 
> Since GIMP is one of the primary use cases for GTK+ on Win32, and
> I feel somewhat tied to GIMP, I hereby "decide" that we want the
> new icons, because GIMP's icons are already updated to the new
> style, and we currently have a mixture of rusty old GTK+ icons
> and shiny new GIMP icons that doesn't really look consistent.
> 
> I also don't see what's wrong with using the default theme/icons
> on Unix. I do that, and surely there are many others.
> 
> ciao,
> --mitch
> 
-- 
-[http://jimmac.musichall.cz]-
-[even a stopped clock gives a right time twice a day]-