On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 19:16 +0300, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: > Hi! I think there is a bug in the gtk_bindings_activate from > gtkbindings. > I'm not sure, thus I didn't open it. > > Here is example of what happens: > > GtkWidget *entry; > entry = gtk_entry_new (); > //... Some routines like settext > int modifiers = 0; > modifiers |= GDK_CONTROL_MASK; > gtk_bindings_activate(G_OBJECT(entry),118,modifiers); //118 is the > keycode of 'V', and it works (text is pasted). > gtk_bindings_activate(G_OBJECT(entry),1741,modifiers); > /* > 1741 is the code of Cyrillic_em, which is located on the same physical > key as 'V'. So thei shortcut should work too, but > gtk_bindings_activate returns FALSE. > What's wrong? Should it work or the idea of gtk_bindings_activate in > something else? > */ The full handling is only present when you use gtk_bindings_activate_event(). By the time that you go from an event to a keyval, needed information has been lost. - Owen (gtk_bindings_activate() is basically just there for compatibility - it existed before the fancy handling that does the Cyrillic vs. Latin on the same key was implemented.)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part