Re: alternative button order: Why don't we auto-guess the alternative order by default if appropriate?
- From: Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>
- To: Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: alternative button order: Why don't we auto-guess the alternative order by default if appropriate?
- Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:51:28 +0100
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 14:25 +0100, Christian Neumair wrote:
> I'm mainly asking because in 99% of the cases one wants the alternative
> order to be reverse from the original order
I haven't found a definitive source for this, but as far as I know, your
assumption breaks as soon as a third button is added. Then the typical
alternative order is not the reverse of the original one. See this
example:
standard: [Reset] [Cancel] [OK]
alternative: [Reset] [OK] [Cancel]
I might be totally wrong here, but that's how we are arranging the
buttons based on feedback from Windows users.
Sven
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]