Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)
- From: "Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>
- To: "Matthias Clasen" <matthias clasen gmail com>
- Cc: Tim Janik <timj gtk org>, pygtk <pygtk daa com au>, GTK+ development mailing list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, Sven Neumann <sven gimp org>
- Subject: Re: Fwd: gtk+ API change; who should fix it? (A.k.a. Why isn't GNOME 2.19.4 released yet?)
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:24:57 -0600
On 6/22/07, Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com> wrote:
On 6/22/07, Sven Neumann <sven gimp org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 10:27 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
>
> > so far, my take on the issue is that PyGtk should adapt to that
> > change by not using tooltips->tips_data_list
>
> I have attached a patch to
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449318 that removes access to
> private GtkTooltips struct members from the pygtk bindings. I can't tell
> if this will break any PyGTK apps but I guess that these bindings have
> only been added for the sake of completeness.
>
Thats fine. Can we still please revert the field name change to make existing
pygtk versions compile against 2.11.x ?
And is there any chance we could get a new tarball so we can release
GNOME 2.19.4?
Thanks!
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]