Re: gobject introspection
- From: Damon Chaplin <damon karuna eclipse co uk>
- To: Rob Taylor <rob taylor codethink co uk>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org, "dbus lists freedesktop org" <dbus lists freedesktop org>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Subject: Re: gobject introspection
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 11:11:51 +0100
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 01:12 +0100, Rob Taylor wrote:
> Michael Lawrence wrote:
> > I made some suggestions along those lines a while ago on the GtkDocFuture
> > page: http://live.gnome.org/DocumentationProject/GtkDocFuture. It's at the
> > bottom of the page.
I'm not sure I like the idea of the gtk-doc comments containing extra
tags for return values and arguments. It could get pretty messy.
> Yeah, hmm, my take is that the introspection data should live in the
> code, and gtk-doc should pick these up for the docs (just like signals
> and object hierarchy). I'll be able to tell more after hashing out my
> prototype. One point I'm interested in from that POV: are there any
> plans for gtk-doc to document signals/properties on interfaces? (e.g. by
> instantiating objects pretending to implement them?)
gtk-doc documents signals/properties on interfaces already.
Damon
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
