On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Morten Welinder wrote:
>> nobody has to use this syntax. you can stick to the ever simple:
>> g_assert (foo > bar);
>>
>> however if you want the value of 'foo' and 'bar' be printed out, instead
>> of just the value of (foo > bar) which would be 0 or 1, then there are
>> no other means than using something simialr to:
>> g_assert_cmpfloat (foo, >, bar);
>
> No other way? You just need to think outside the box^w^wcpp. How
> about a pre-cpp filter that looks at the source code, finds the g_assert,
> and does a little creative rewriting?
how about that? bad.
we don't use a preprocessor like moc before cpp+cc. if we did,
GObject would look a million times different.
people are coding such a thing after the fact these days though,
look at vala to see how it looks like.