Re: On Emblems
- From: "Matthias Clasen" <matthias clasen gmail com>
- To: "Stefan Kost" <ensonic hora-obscura de>
- Cc: gvfs-list gnome org, gtk-devel-list gnome org, nautilus-list gnome org, gnome-soc-list <gnome-soc-list gnome org>, thunar-dev xfce org
- Subject: Re: On Emblems
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:55:08 -0400
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Stefan Kost <ensonic hora-obscura de> wrote:
>
> How important is that we keep the term "emblem". I don't like
> 'GEmblemableIcon' that much. The emblem can be used as a
> decoration/annotation/tag. So what about
> - GThemedIcon
> +----GIconDecoration:
>
> - GInterface
> +----GDecoratableIcon:
> (is 'decoratable' an english word?)
The term 'emblem' is not very important, and yes, GEmblemedIcon is not
a very nice name. When initially discussed this api, we spent some time
trying to come up with a better one, but nothing really convincing came up.
So GEmblemedIcon stayed. Its just a name, after all...
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]