Re: Merging libsexy widgets

[Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>]

On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 14:45 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On my Berlin GTK+ Hackfest blog post [1] I got two comments about adding
> libsexy to the agenda.
> 
> I don't think we need to discuss libsexy in a meeting, let alone a
> hackfest.  Libsexy IIUC is a staging area for widgets, similar to
> libegg.  If that's the case, it cannot be "merged" at once and needs to
> be done for each widget/functionality separately.  That kind of
> development is already happening and has a natural home: bugzilla and
> this list.  What needs to be done is for someone to open a bug about
> merging their favorite libsexy widget into Gtk+, prepare a patch, reply
> to maintainer concerns, refine it, repeat until merged.

I think, to start with, we should see which widgets are available in
there, which ones are obsoleted by features in GTK+ itself (such as
tooltips for single lines in treeviews), and file bugs for those we'd
want to merge.