Re: GObject-Introspection 0.5.0
- From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini gnu org>
- To: Paul Pogonyshev <pogonyshev gmx net>
- Cc: gnome-announce-list gnome org, gtk-devel-list gnome org, language-bindings gnome org, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>, Johan Dahlin <johan gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GObject-Introspection 0.5.0
- Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:05:08 +0200
>> I'm leaning towards using the "ownership" terminology instead of "transfer".
>> typedef enum {
>> GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLER, /* caller owns it, caller should free it after use */
>> GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLEE /* callee owns it, caller should leave it as it is */
>> } GITypeOwnership;
>
> Just as a nitpick, these two names look very similar and quite confusing
> for non-native English speakers. Maybe you could come up with something
> different, especially in place of 'callee'?
It's actually commonly-used terminology, e.g. "caller-save registers"
vs. "callee-save registers" in compilers.
Paolo
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]