Re: Widget states for 3.0 (and 2.18?)
- From: Thomas Wood <thos gnome org>
- To: Neil Jagdish Patel <neil patel canonical com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Widget states for 3.0 (and 2.18?)
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:29:41 +0100
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 15:17 +0100, Neil Jagdish Patel wrote:
> Right. Although in my mind the checkbox is active when in that state
> (same for radiobuttons), so it would make sense to have a bit-field for
> states.
Yup, this is why I suggested using an enum for the generic states that
are mutually exclusive, and a separate bitfield for other more specific
states. However, I realise that checked and unchecked are clearly
mutually exclusive as well so still not ideal...
Regards,
Thomas
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
