Re: GtkOrientable: Can widgets now be flipped?
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Mathias Hasselmann <mathias hasselmann gmx de>
- Cc: mitch <mitch gimp org>, gtk-devel-list gnome org, Sven Herzberg <herzi-ml gnome-de org>
- Subject: Re: GtkOrientable: Can widgets now be flipped?
- Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 21:57:53 +0100
On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 21:36 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 21:04 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 18:47 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, den 08.02.2009, 18:36 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> > > > On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 14:51 +0100, Sven Herzberg wrote:
> > > > > AFAIR, you can flip it of you create a GtkBox/GtkScale, but not if you
> > > > > create a Gtk[HV]{Box,Scale}... Mitch?
> > > >
> > > > Ah. Were those base classes (GtkBox, etc) instantiable before?
> > > >
> > > > If the base classes can now already do everything then shouldn't the V/H
> > > > classes be deprecated already?
> >
> > A deprecation doesn't force people to change anything. It's not (yet) a
> > removal of the API, though I guess that is planned for the future. It is
> > a useful hint and it explains the apparent duplication.
>
> Still you have to react on deprecations better soon than later, if you
> want to avoid drowning some day.
Yes, but surely that decision has been made already by the addition of
GtkOrientable?
> Oh, from reading this thread I thought this would be the case, but
> apparently it is not. Seems you really can change the orientation of
> some Gtk[HV]Box now. Shocking.
Actually Christian Dywan says they can't flip. But I still think they
are meant (by the developers who made the change) to be deprecated so
that isn't very relevant anyway.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]