Re: Review of gnio, round 1



Am Mon, 11 May 2009 10:49:31 -0400
schrieb Dan Winship <danw gnome org>:

> On 05/11/2009 10:30 AM, Stefan Kost wrote:
> > Alexander Larsson schrieb:
> >> GResolver is already in gio, yes. NameResolver isn't really less
> >> generic than GResolver though. What else would it resolve but
> >> names? Could be GDNSResolver though.
> >>
> >>   
> > That sounds good. I was just wondering as there are other resolvers
> > too (SATResolver, EquationResolver, ...)
> 
> But are those likely to ever be in the "G" namespace?
> 
> Also, it's an interface to libresolv, so... GResolver.
> 
> But anyway, we could rename it to GDNSResolver if people wanted. Or
> just "GDNS"?

I think clear naming is good, as long as it doesn't make the name thrice
as long.

Maybe GDomainResolver or GHostResolver? I tend to find spelled out
words more readable than acronyms.

Just my 2 pfennig,
    Christian


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]