Re: Review of gnio, round 1
- From: Christian Dywan <christian imendio com>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Review of gnio, round 1
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:59:25 +0200
Am Mon, 11 May 2009 10:49:31 -0400
schrieb Dan Winship <danw gnome org>:
> On 05/11/2009 10:30 AM, Stefan Kost wrote:
> > Alexander Larsson schrieb:
> >> GResolver is already in gio, yes. NameResolver isn't really less
> >> generic than GResolver though. What else would it resolve but
> >> names? Could be GDNSResolver though.
> >>
> >>
> > That sounds good. I was just wondering as there are other resolvers
> > too (SATResolver, EquationResolver, ...)
>
> But are those likely to ever be in the "G" namespace?
>
> Also, it's an interface to libresolv, so... GResolver.
>
> But anyway, we could rename it to GDNSResolver if people wanted. Or
> just "GDNS"?
I think clear naming is good, as long as it doesn't make the name thrice
as long.
Maybe GDomainResolver or GHostResolver? I tend to find spelled out
words more readable than acronyms.
Just my 2 pfennig,
Christian
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]