Re: tree model

[Ryan Lortie <desrt desrt ca>]

Thomas Wood wrote:
> I think the Clutter project has it's own model implementation only
> because there isn't one in glib. There isn't actually a consumer in
> Clutter for ClutterModel, but other libraries built on top of Clutter
> use it.

Yes.  It's exactly about libraries.

I have a similar situation with GSettings -- I want to allow people to 
place GSettingsList objects inside of GtkTreeView if they want, but 
GSettings itself has no other reason to depend on GTK.  Since 
GtkTreeModel also has no reason to depend on (the rest of) GTK, it seems 
logical to move it into glib.

Cheers