[PATCH] Fix yet another --with-threads bug: using "pipe" instead of "logical OR"
- From: "Andrew W. Nosenko" <andrew w nosenko gmail com>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: [PATCH] Fix yet another --with-threads bug: using "pipe" instead of "logical OR"
- Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:19:47 +0300
Unfortunately, at the time of writing
2bdf87e Restore behavior of --with-threads without argument
I was too concentrated on --with-threads without arguments and left
second problem in this check unattended: the test chain was built using
'|' pipe instead of '||' logical OR.
As consequence, case --with-threads=pthread remained broken, and
enabling threads by default become broken if neither --with-threads nor
--without-threads passed to configure at all.
* configure.in: use '||' for "logical OR" operator as it should to be
instead of '|' (pipe).
---
configure.in | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in
index 4d540cf..627ce48 100644
--- a/configure.in
+++ b/configure.in
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ if test "$with_threads" = "no" ; then
else
echo Enabling multithreaded support
dnl Use pthread by default
- if test "$with_threads" = "pthread" | test "$with_threads" = "" | test "$with_threads" = "yes" ; then
+ if test "$with_threads" = "pthread" || test "$with_threads" = "" || test "$with_threads" = "yes" ; then
AC_CHECK_HEADER(pthread.h,
AC_CHECK_LIB(pthread, pthread_join,[
THREAD_LIBS="-lpthread"
--
1.6.4.4
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]