Re: GtkBin as a publicly derivable abstract class please.
- From: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: GtkBin as a publicly derivable abstract class please.
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:46:46 +0000
On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 14:50 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> Guys,
> this is the kind of thing we could probably just
> resolve on irc but I work an opposite schedule so I'm
> taking it to the list.
>
> Today I found '_gtk_bin_set_child()'
what's wrong with gtk_container_add()?
> Making that a private api render's GtkBin completely
> useless as a subclassable container outside of GTK+.
why? when sub-classing GtkBin the GtkContainer implementation has
already been provided; if you want to inject some particular code into
it you just need to override add() and chain up at the place of your
convenience.
> But I beg to differ, GtkBin is definitely a useful
> abstract class to derive from.
yes, and that's obviously possible.
> Also I noticed that the implementation takes no
> reference to the child.
because it's a private method for internal usage; it should be
documented, if it's not, though.
ciao,
Emmanuele.
--
W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name
B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]