Re: Wrapping Box Container
- From: Tristan Van Berkom <tristanvb openismus com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp pobox com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Wrapping Box Container
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:37:50 +0900
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 22:07 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> While I'm making trivial comments about wrap box - there's START/END
> in several other enums, rather than BEGIN/END (just look through
> gtkenums.h, wrap box is the only BEGIN)
>
> @GTK_WRAP_BOX_SPREAD_EVEN description says "evenly distributed between
> children" which I think means "as spacing between children" but I read
> it several times thinking it meant the children got the space (as in
> EXPAND)
Thanks a lot for your comments Havoc :)
I'll make the change for BEGIN->START to be more consistent with other
apis... good point.
SPREAD_EVEN is exactly that.. adding extra space between the children as
spacing, and there is SPREAD_EXPAND for the other (not sure if that
could be better explained).
Regarding your other mail in this thread... I agree the _insert_child()
api has alot of arguments, my original idea was to simply reuse
GtkAttachOptions enum (except I'm not sure exactly what to do with
GTK_SHRINK).
What would we prefer here ? A single AttachOptions type which can
be used amongst many containers or a custom enumeration ?
>
> also, there's a lot of trailing whitespace showing up red in my emacs ;-)
I'll give a look into that...
Cheers,
-Tristan
>
> Havoc
[Date Prev][
Date Next] [Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]