Re: GTK+ policy (was RE:rendering-cleanup-next)
- From: Kristian Rietveld <kris gtk org>
- To: Paul Davis <paul linuxaudiosystems com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GTK+ policy (was RE:rendering-cleanup-next)
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:49:20 +0200
On Sep 14, 2010, at 3:48 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Matthias Clasen
> <matthias clasen gmail com> wrote:
>> 2010/9/13 Thomas Wood <thos gnome org>:
>>>
>>> Clutter's (very detailed) coding style document may be useful here,
>>> since it has a very similar coding style to GTK+:
>>>
>>> http://git.clutter-project.org/clutter/tree/doc/CODING_STYLE
>>>
>>
>> Yes, I think we could basically adopt this word-by-word.
>
> i know that coding styles are, as it says in the clutter guide,
> "arbitrary", but i would just like to mention one little detail that i
> find problematic when working on shared projects (and much less so on
> non-shared projects). this rule:
>
> ----------------------------------
> Curly braces should not be used for single statement blocks:
>
> if (condition)
> single_statement ();
> else
> another_single_statement (arg1);
> -----------------------------------
To add to this, it does not specify how to deal with braces in nested if-statements. When I start to nest if-statements (also with a single-statement body) I typically start adding braces, because it is a bit clearer and avoids the dangling else problem.
regards,
-kris.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]