Re: Glib resource framework
- From: Hub Figuière <hfiguiere teaser fr>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Glib resource framework
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:12:17 -0800
On 22/12/11 12:04 AM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 15:07 -0800, Hub Figuière wrote:
>> On 21/12/11 02:47 PM, Alexander Larsson wrote:
>>> I think this could be very useful in many places, for instance to ship built-in
>>> css files, gtk builder files, win32 theme images etc in a way that still makes libraries
>>> relocatable (and avoids potential for runtime errors due to not found files).
>>
>> Maybe we could actually support "bundles" like it is done on MacOS.
>> The idea of compiling data into a binary file give me a blast from the
>> past from the MacOS 9 days.
>
> See:
> http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2011/09/30/rethinking-the-linux-distibution/
I had read that one back when you posted it, and I got lost at "mount
namespace" and "fuse filesystem".
The use case described is pretty much what I am thinking, but with a way
simpler design: all about making things relocatable. A portable "prefix"
if you want.
Hub
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]