Re: migration document missing

[Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>]

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Andrew Cowie
<andrew operationaldynamics com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 19:47 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:00 +1100, Andrew Cowie wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 22:24 +0100, Tadej Borovšak wrote:
>> >
>> > > http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk3/unstable/gtk-migrating-2-to-3.html
>> >
>> > Any reason not to have the URLs at .../gtk/3.0/... ?
>>
>> It's there now.
>
> Really? Here we get:
>
> http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/3.0/gtk-migrating-2-to-3.html
> http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/stable/gtk-migrating-2-to-3.html
>
> 404
>
> I just noticed that other /gtk/stable/ URLs point to GTK 2.24; is GTK
> 3.0 now not the stable release? Regardless, I still don't understand:

We essentially now have a stable 2.x release (2.24) and a stable 3.0 release.
library.gnome.org shows them as

http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/stable and
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk3/stable.

which I think is clear enough.

> http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/2.24/GtkWindow.html
> http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk/3.0/GtkWindow.html
>
> What's the parallel filename problem?

The filename problem happens in local packages. Could it have been
solved by embedding the version number in the path ? Certainly. But
thats not how gtk-doc is set up to work...