Re: RFC: new features



On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Paolo Borelli <pborelli katamail com> wrote:

> UNDO
> A full undo/redo stack may belong in glib,

to me, this is highly unrealistic. undo/redo is incredibly application
(and "scale") specific. even inside one application, it can make sense
to find two entirely different approaches to handling undo/redo (e.g.
one based on save/restore of the full state of objects and other based
on storing differences in state).


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]