Re: Commercial support page on gtk.org
- From: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu sugarlabs org>
- To: Daniel Garcia <danigm wadobo com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Commercial support page on gtk.org
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:33:29 +0100
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 14:05, Daniel Garcia <danigm wadobo com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:41:31PM +0000, Martyn Russell wrote:
>> On 23/03/12 11:49, Daniel Garcia wrote:
>> >On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 03:12:32PM +0000, Martyn Russell wrote:
>> >>Hi all,
>> >>
>> >>For a while, I/we at Lanedo have thought that gtk.org is missing a
>> >>commercial support page. Qt has one and it's even been requested by
>> >>some clients in the past IIRC.
>> >>
>> >>I've been meaning to merge this branch for a while:
>> >>
>> >> http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk-web/log/?h=support
>> >>
>> >>The result is demonstrated here:
>> >>
>> >> http://curlybeast.net:8080/support.php
>> >>
>> >>I made a few small changes today and am happy with it myself. Just
>> >>so people know, the list of companies is randomly listed, so there
>> >>is no bias about ordering here.
>> >>
>> >>If there are no major objections, I will push this by Friday this
>> >>week or shortly after.
>> >>
>> >>Comments welcome,
>> >
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >At wadobo we provide gtk consultant, development and training. it
>> >could be great to appear in http://www.gtk.org/support.php
>> >
>> >I attached a patch to add wadobo to support, feel free to push if you
>> >think Wadobo can be in this list.
>>
>> I guess we need to have some rules about who gets added to make sure
>> we don't add people who just want to be on that page. We've seen
>> this with OpenOffice, but the page link escapes me.
>>
>> I am not saying Wadobo is unworthy, just that it has occurred to me
>> we need to be careful about flooding that list.
>>
>> Daniel, what sort of support are you offering around GTK+ and do you
>> have any commits you can point to which show contribution to the
>> project?
>>
>
> You're right, some rules are needed. Qt asks you for qt certified
> developers in your team, maybe in gtk we should make some kind of gtk+
> certification.
At least for this specific purpose, I think being able to show past
substantial contributions are better.
Regards,
Tomeu
> In wadobo we offer gtk+ app development, a11y gtk support and so. Last
> year I was working in evince a11y [1][2][3], but unfortunately currently
> I don't have much time to spent on this.
>
> I also develop a gtk application called TBO [4]
>
>
> [1] http://git.gnome.org/browse/evince/log/?qt=author&q=danigm
> [2] http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/?id=799c3e4e57a4d7c17a6998d8fafb1cfc988389f6
> [3] http://git.gnome.org/browse/pyatspi2/commit/?id=0641883731ab891e327ef215baded9fbd7c0706c
> [4] http://git.gnome.org/browse/tbo/
>
> --
> Daniel Garcia 0034 668 810 742
> It's not magic, it's wadobo!
> http://wadobo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]