Re: The new GTask name in GIO is wrong

[Christian Hergert <chris dronelabs com>]

On 11/02/2012 07:15 AM, Tal Hadad wrote:
> First, there were an old project called GTask[0], which tried to give
> parallelism ability and
> alternative to today GIO async(I think it wasn't exist back than).
> At first, I thought, what? Gtask has been merged with GIO

I wrote GTask (and Iris), and I was wrong to call it that :-)

I do hope that someday we have task decomposition for doing neat things
with parallel for and callback chains (and you will find such
information in the bug report).

-- Christian