Re: Function completion for GVariant maybe types?
- From: Markus Elfring <Markus Elfring web de>
- To: John Emmas <johne53 tiscali co uk>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Function completion for GVariant maybe types?
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:05:35 +0100
Until a couple of days ago I'd never even encountered GVariant so forgive me
if I've misunderstood the concept - but from what you've written, it seems
like you want to be able to map a nullable object to the state of a checkbox
for some reason.
Yes, that is right.
I give a bit more background information so that you can better understand the
"history" for this issue.
1. I started to adjust the application "GParted" a while ago.
2. I added a Gtk::TreeModelColumn attribute.
3. I noticed that such model classes could not be marked to contain "nothing".
How should "unknown" or "indeterminate" items be represented then?
4. I moved from the abstraction level "C++ glibmm" to "C glib" to add the
missing feature.
5. I wrote the prototype function "g_variant_new_nothing_from_type" according to
my imaginations.
6. I do not like its implementation detail to call the function
"g_variant_get_child_value" if I would only like to extract/inspect a data type
and not to copy a complete value.
7. I try to improve this situation.
So GVariant doesn't seem to be a suitable type for mapping the state of
something whose state can change.
Your conclusion is wrong. - I suggest to read a bit more about the concept of
"immutable objects".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immutable_object
A new object can always be created from a previous one which represents a
read-only status.
Could that be why there's so much reluctance to implement what you want?
No. - I see various factors like the following that result in usual challenges
for my feature request.
- I dare to fiddle with nullable data types and their mappings in different
programming interfaces.
- I try to gather attention from potentially interested parties like software
developers.
- I need to convince corresponding library maintainers to get the desired
functionality added.
Would you like to contribute any more suggestions to improve the involved
communication?
Regards,
Markus
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]