Re: Building glib 2.28.7



Hey guys,

I'm have a new error with my build. I did some searches which suggested to not use --enable-static-nss which I'm not doing. I did do an edit to one of the awk scripts, scripts/gen-sorted.awk, the build was reporting an error on lines containing /\/[^/]+$/ , so I added an extra backslash in the middle to /\/[^\/]+$/ . Hopefully this edit is unrelated.

Here's the error log:
isoc99_scanf.c: In function '__isoc99_scanf':
isoc99_scanf.c:33: error: '_IO_acquire_lock_needs_exceptions_enabled' undeclared (first use in this function)
isoc99_scanf.c:33: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
isoc99_scanf.c:33: error: for each function it appears in.)
isoc99_scanf.c: At top level:
isoc99_scanf.c:40: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'
isoc99_scanf.c:41: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'
isoc99_scanf.c:42: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
make[2]: *** [/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/build-glibc/stdio-common/isoc99_scanf.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
isoc99_vscanf.c: In function '__isoc99_vscanf':
isoc99_vscanf.c:29: error: '_IO_acquire_lock_needs_exceptions_enabled' undeclared (first use in this function)
isoc99_vscanf.c:29: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
isoc99_vscanf.c:29: error: for each function it appears in.)
isoc99_vscanf.c: At top level:
isoc99_vscanf.c:32: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'
isoc99_vscanf.c:33: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'
isoc99_vscanf.c:34: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
make[2]: *** [/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/build-glibc/stdio-common/isoc99_vscanf.o] Error 1
isoc99_fscanf.c: In function '__isoc99_fscanf':
isoc99_fscanf.c:31: error: '_IO_acquire_lock_needs_exceptions_enabled' undeclared (first use in this function)
isoc99_fscanf.c:31: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
isoc99_fscanf.c:31: error: for each function it appears in.)
isoc99_fscanf.c: At top level:
isoc99_fscanf.c:38: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'
isoc99_fscanf.c:39: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'
isoc99_fscanf.c:40: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
make[2]: *** [/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/build-glibc/stdio-common/isoc99_fscanf.o] Error 1
isoc99_vfscanf.c: In function '__isoc99_vfscanf':
isoc99_vfscanf.c:29: error: '_IO_acquire_lock_needs_exceptions_enabled' undeclared (first use in this function)
isoc99_vfscanf.c:29: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
isoc99_vfscanf.c:29: error: for each function it appears in.)
isoc99_vfscanf.c: At top level:
isoc99_vfscanf.c:32: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'
isoc99_vfscanf.c:33: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'
isoc99_vfscanf.c:34: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' token
make[2]: *** [/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/build-glibc/stdio-common/isoc99_vfscanf.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/stdio-common'
make[1]: *** [stdio-common/subdir_lib] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7'
make: *** [all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /home/xxx/ltib_xx/tmp/rpm-tmp.15860 (%build)


-Dan


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Colin Walters <walters verbum org> wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:28 -0800, Daniel Schultze wrote:


> The host is Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64, the target CPU is an arm926ejs on a
> Freescale board, using LTIB. It is an older system using glibc 2.5
> with glibc ports 2.5.

From a quick look, this commit to glibc looks like it updated the splice
prototype:

commit 99ea5991a4957f7a21466a4b48c5020eb70db2b7
Author:     Ulrich Drepper <drepper redhat com>
AuthorDate: Wed Aug 30 15:05:29 2006 +0000

    * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/alpha/bits/fcntl.h (splice): Add offin

Which as you can see is really quite ancient.

> --- glib-2.28.7.orig/configure 2011-05-20 21:15:25.000000000 -0700
> +++ glib-2.28.7/configure 2013-11-08 10:15:51.380683520 -0800
> @@ -23107,7 +23107,6 @@
>    ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "splice" "ac_cv_func_splice"
>  if test "x$ac_cv_func_splice" = xyes; then :
>    cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
> -#define HAVE_SPLICE 1
>  _ACEOF

That's probably fine as a fix for you for now, this issue will go away
when you update to a version of glibc from this decade too =)






[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]