On 03/21/2016 07:42 PM, Randall Sawyer
wrote:
On 03/21/2016 07:29 PM, Randall Sawyer wrote:
I am ready in all earnestness to submit the proposal for the
conclusion of new UTF-8-length-oriented functions
'g_utf_unilen()' and
Oops - again - for my conflation between intended motivation -
'conclusion' - and requisite process - 'nominal inclusion'.
'g_pointer_to_offset_sized()' - declared in
"gunicode.h" and defined in "gutf8.c" [https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2016-March/msg00042.html]
Oops! Make that 'g_utf8_unilen()' instead of 'g_utf_unilen()' and
'g utf8_offset_to_pointer_sized()' instead of
'g_pointer_to_offset_sized()'.
I have instructions at https://wiki.gnome.org/Git/Developers#Local_Branches
and at https://wiki.gnome.org/Git/Developers#Contributing_patches
Which of these two is the appropriate one to follow?
Thank you,
Yours,
Randall
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
|
