Re: 1e+02% function docs coverage

[Damon Chaplin <damon ximian com>]

On Tue, 2001-10-09 at 04:34, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Fine with me.

OK. Done.
 
> What I would like to see eventually is broken down completeness statistics
> not
> only for functions/macros, but also for the other kinds of symbols gtk-doc
> cares about.
> If that is too much work, I would tend to think that the global completeness
> count
> should not only look at functions and macros,  but at all symbols.
> Otherwise, the
> 100% give a wrong signal.

Yes, it should. Feel free to bugzilla it (and add a patch if you like ;)

Damon