Re: Setting HTML tags in C-style comments.
- From: Matthias Clasen <maclas gmx de>
- To: Rich Burridge <Rich Burridge Sun COM>
- Cc: gtk-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Setting HTML tags in C-style comments.
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 16:49:53 +0200 (MEST)
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've defined a C-style API for GNOME for doing collaboration called Share.
>
>
> See:
>
> http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/rview.cgi?cvsroot=/cvs/gnome&dir=Share
>
> I've written the comments in the .c source files to use gtk-doc for
> the documentation. That seems to be working fine except that I want
> it to recognize (and correctly handle) various HTML tags sprinkled
> throughout the comments in the code. See line 55-63 in:
>
>
http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/cvsblame.cgi?file=Share%2Fshare/share_byte_array.c&r
> ev=&root=/cvs/gnome
>
> for example.
>
> Note that it only has to understand:
>
> <UL></UL>
> <LI></LI>
> <P></P>
>
> Now I have:
>
> MKDB_OPTIONS=--sgml-mode --output-format=xml
>
> in my .../docs/reference/Makefile.am
>
> and that prevents the < substitution (etc), but at HTML generation
> time I get a load of lines like:
>
> ...
> Writing Share-ShareSessionListener.html for
> refentry(Share-ShareSessionListener)No template matches UL.
> No template matches LI.
> No template matches LI.
> No template matches LI.
> No template matches LI.
> No template matches LI.
> No template matches LI.
> No template matches LI.
> Writing Share-ShareSessionManager.html for
> refentry(Share-ShareSessionManager)
> No template matches UL.
> No template matches LI.
> ...
>
> and it generates HTML files which don't do the right thing (see attached
> file).
>
> Now I guess I have to add a template for this somewhere, and maybe adjust
> a couple of files, but I'm not sure where.
>
gtk-doc supports using docbook tags in inline comments, not html tags. The
MKDB_OPTIONS looked right, just use the corresponding docbook markup.
Matthias
--
COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test
--------------------------------------------------
1. GMX TopMail - Platz 1 und Testsieger!
2. GMX ProMail - Platz 2 und Preis-Qualitätssieger!
3. Arcor - 4. web.de - 5. T-Online - 6. freenet.de - 7. daybyday - 8. e-Post
[
Date Prev][Date Next] [
Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]