Re: xxx-undocumented.txt

[Damon Chaplin <damon karuna uklinux net>]

On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 11:50, Stefan Kost wrote:
> hi hi,
> 
> another entry for future changes:
> Currently gtkdoc only adds undocumented symbols to xxx-undocumented.txt. If one
> has undocumented function parameters, or undocuments struct-members, enum-values
> ..., this is not recorded.
> I would prefer this been part of the undocumented file as well, e.g. in the form of:
> 
> my_function param_1
> my_function param_5
> 
> or alternatively
> 
> my_function
>   param_1
>   param_5

I think it would be enough to add it to xxx-undocumented if any
parameters/struct members at all weren't documented.
Do we really need to know exactly which parameters/members aren't
documented? 

Damon