Re: linkification warnings
- From: Nicola Fontana <ntd entidi it>
- To: David Nečas <yeti physics muni cz>
- Cc: gtk-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: linkification warnings
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:58:10 +0100
Il giorno Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:18:02 +0100
David Nečas <yeti physics muni cz> ha scritto:
> 1) A few of my objects have some public, documented fields. They are
> marked /*<public>*/ and they appear correctly in the docs. But I
> cannot link to them.
>
> Writing #GwyRGBA.r where GwyRGBA is a plain struct produces the
> correct link to the field. But writing #GwyField.xreal where
> GwyField is an object struct leads to a warning and no link. Must
> something special be done for objects?
Hi David,
I think the problem is the link to a struct that is subclassing a
GObject is renamed to MyStructName+"_struct" [1] (resulting in
MyStructName-struct after the id mangling). I suppose this is done to
differentiate the link to the section from the link to the struct in the
same GObject page, a quite common situation in GTK+.
If this is the case, using #GwyField-struct.xreal should work (I don't
use public fields in GObjects so I cannot test it by myself). You can
anyway check the resulting HTML to see how (and if) it is used.
Ciao.
--
Nicola
[1] http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gtk-doc/tree/gtkdoc-mkdb.in#n1340
>
> 2) What is the expected behaviour of the link validity checking for
> functions? I was happy to get no bogus warnings after the last
> tweaks. But then I realized I get no warnings for function links at
> all. Is it right?
>
> Yeti
>
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-doc-list mailing list
> gtk-doc-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-doc-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]