Re: [gtk-list] Re: objgtk vs. threads on RH 4.2
- From: fractture <fract sprintmail com>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: objgtk vs. threads on RH 4.2
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 06:08:26 -0700
>
>
> The problem is not so much that the errno definitions differ, but that errno in
> libc5 under Linux is not thread safe. I.e. if one thread sets errno to
> something, it will be set for all threads. Basically, if you want to do
> threads, go for libc6. (As far as I know, though, switching libc is _not_
> trivial. Go for a nice new distribution such as RH5. (Although that has other
> problems.))
If you have a PC, just wait for Stampede Linux ;)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Johannes.
> --
> A tidy room is the sign of a sick mind.
>
> Gathering Magician in a Magic-less world?
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]