Re: [gtk-list] Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Proposed widget
- From: Nils Philippsen <nils rhlx01 rz fht-esslingen de>
- To: gtk-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [gtk-list] Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Proposed widget
- Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 09:45:47 +0200 (CEST)
On Sun, 24 May 1998, KC5TJA wrote:
> This is, to date, the only legitamate reason given, and it's an important
> one to boot. You present a point of view which I had not taken in the
> past (that of active web content). While it is (reasonably) easy for
> commercial companies to ensure mostly-bug-free software, such cannot be
Well, I don't want to let this end in the next discussion about paradigms of
software development (open source vs. commercial/proprietary), but:
- Every software may contain bugs/glitches. The probability of bugs in a
program increases with its size.
- As of my experience commercial programs are by far larger than open source
developped ones [OFFTOPIC: anyone got comments on the grammar of this
sentence (especially on the syntax since I'm not a native english-
speaker)? Would be nice if you mailed them to me, thanks]
- Well, if it's so easy for THEM (in comparison to US :-) to ensure bug-free
programs, then why don't they do it (e.g. MS-{Windows,Office,...}, Netscape
Navigator, ... suck big time concerning stability)? Of course this
conclusion is based on empirical studies :-)
> said of web applets written by a neophyte or cracker.
For the last one you're comparing apples to pears (as a cracker would violate
memory intentionally this can not be considered a bug - or did you mean a
hacker? Then this doesn't fit - hackers are per definitionem wit enough to
produce no bugs at all :-).
Have a nice day,
Nils
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nils Philippsen @college: nils@rhlx01.rz.fht-esslingen.de
Vogelsangstrasse 115 @home: nils@wombat.dialup.fht-esslingen.de
D 70197 Stuttgart phone: +49-711-6599405
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Wer heute an der Bildung spart, Those who scrimp on education today,
hat morgen noch bloedere Politiker. get even dumber politicians tomorrow.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]