Re: [gtk-list] Re: Gtk+ Commercial Applications (Licencing Issues)

[Rob Huffstedtler <rob bagpipe com>]

I have to second Havoc's suggestion/motion/opionion/pronouncement:

Read the licenses, talk to a lawyer, take the discussion to the
appropriate newgroup.

On 6 Oct
1999, Preben Randhol wrote:

> "Robert G. Brown" <rgb@phy.duke.edu> writes:
> 
> | Note well that NONE of the GPL (library or otherwise) versions state
> | that you have to release code in which you use GPL programs or link to
> | GPL libraries -- after all, how can they do that?  It isn't theirs to
> | give away!  Also, what are they going to do, make you set up a website
> | for distribution?
> 
> As long as you are distributing binaries (linked against GPL'ed work)
> I understand you have too.
> -- 
> Preben Randhol                 Affliction is enamoured of thy parts, 
> [randhol@pvv.org]              And thou art wedded to calamity. 
> [http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/]                    -- W. Shakespeare 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe gtk-list-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
> 
> 

  +=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=
  =   Rob Huffstedtler          |     We now return to our regularly     +
  +   (931) 596-3560            |        scheduled programming           =
  =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+