Re: Fwd: Ann: GtkCanvas 0.1
- From: Matthew <matthew mattshouse com>
- To: Salmaso Raffaele <r salmaso inwind it>
- Cc: gtk-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Ann: GtkCanvas 0.1
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 15:04:40 -0500
>[Reposted to the list]
>
>Il 24 Jul 2000 12:30:31 -0400, Havoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com>
>scrisse:
>
>> - Federico keeps saying he's going to change stuff about the canvas,
>> that it needs a lot of work
>> - the antialiased canvas stuff seems to be in flux; we're sort of
>> waiting on the X render extension to put a vector API in GTK
>> - there's no time to really consider the issue in detail
>>
>>Tim is the other GTK maintainer.
>
>Well, The actual canvas is not so special, ok. It needs to be
>reimplemented, ok.
>But actually it is all what we have.
>
>I prefer to have the GtkCanvas in Gtk+ 2.0, even if it isn't ok, than
>not having at all.
I agree with this 100% as long as there are no stability issues concerning
GtkCanvas. If it's just a matter of feature-reordering then I think that it
should be included.
We're digressing into a chicken/egg thing. Gnome is built with the Gtk widgets,
but a key Gtk widget cannot be implimented because of a problem with Gnome.
It's a matter of Gnome trying to be its own widget set, and relegating Gtk to a
"list and button" library.
Overdramatization, as per usual.
Matthew
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]