Fwd: GTK+ is real object oriented?

[frederico schardong <frede sch gmail com>]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: frederico schardong <frede sch gmail com>
Date: 2009/12/20
Subject: Re: GTK+ is real object oriented?
To: David Nečas <yeti physics muni cz>


Maybe I had expressed wrong.

I don't wanna say that GTK+ NOT IS OO, I'm saying that the way that
GTK+ implements the concepts of OO is different. As I say before...
"change a attribute (visibility) of a class (gtkwidget) only can be
changed by a function (gtk_widget_hide() or (gtk_widget_show()) not by
a method".

Yes, GTK+ has been construct around OO concepts, buts it have all
those concepts that a say before (class, objects,
instance, method, inheritance, abstraction, encapsulation, polymorphism)?

Because this things a say that's fake (maybe not the correct word).

2009/12/20 David Nečas <yeti physics muni cz>:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 03:40:34PM -0200, frederico schardong wrote:
>> The difference is that not a really object-oriented, is a fake object-oriented.
>>
>> I call it fake object-oriented environment, maybe not the most
>> correctly name, but i think is true.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I think you still did not give any definition of what real and fake
> means.  At least for you since others will likely disagree whatever the
> definition is.
>
> So again, it is built around OO concepts and behaves like an OO
> environment.  How can you tell it is a fake?
>
> Yeti
>
>



--
Thanks,
Frederico Schardong,
SOLIS - Open source solutions
www.solis.coop.br
Linux registered user #500582



-- 
Thanks,
Frederico Schardong,
SOLIS - Open source solutions
www.solis.coop.br
Linux registered user #500582